Quoted from bumblethru

GB....DVR said he was waiting for verification! Ya gotta give him that.

Rotterdam is a small town. Everything will come out eventually. The days of 'sweeping under the rug' are GONE!!!

I do know that there are questions about the number of businesses (3) and the apartment in a building only approved for 2 businesses.

I have heard that there may have been another "business" operating that wasn't advertised on the sign on the outside of the building - that is all that I
can say publicly for now,

Who owns the building? You should ask them.

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

I do know that there are questions about the number of businesses (3) and the apartment in a building only approved for 2 businesses.

I have heard that there may have been another "business" operating that wasn't advertised on the sign on the outside of the building - that is all that I
can say publicly for now,

So, I'm not sure I see the relevance to the fire?   What's the connection?

There is nothing nefarious about The Rockowitz family.  The have owned on Altamont Avenue for years...at least 20 I think.  They also own in Guilderland same operation.

Quoted from boomer

There is nothing nefarious about The Rockowitz family.  The have owned on Altamont Avenue for years...at least 20 I think.  They also own in Guilderland same operation.

Booms....re-read...K? No one is talking about the rockowitz family!!!!! The reference was to 4 corners pizza!!!!

Quoted from MobileTerminal

So, I'm not sure I see the relevance to the fire?   What's the connection?

The relevance is that certain owners of the pizza shop property are quick to claim that others have broken
law  (ex. Town Clerk) but may have violated town laws at the same time.

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

The relevance is that certain owners of the pizza shop property are quick to claim that others have broken
law  (ex. Town Clerk) but may have violated town laws at the same time.

Where has Mike Putorti (the property owner) claimed others have "broken laws" ??  There is only ONE owner of the property - and he's emphatically non-political.

You have your facts wrong again DVR. The "pizza" guys DO NOT OWN THE BUILDING. This is the what happens when you spread lies in blind political malice as you Schitnectady County democraps are known to do: you confound yourselves. The pizza guys RENT THE SPACE. Mike Putorti is not in politics and HE OWNS THE BUILDING.

So do you want to back up now and retract your dumb comments?

Just because the chairmen tell you stupid lies to spread doesn't mean you should repeat them without doing your own fact checking. Wake up, you are smarter and a better person than that, so in this case you disappoint. Don't be lead blindly by Tony cervera or Chris Gardner or any of the poison filled democrap haters. Mike Putorti is a great guy and doesn't have a political bone in his body. Making him a target of malice will only make you guys more enemies.

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

The relevance is that certain owners of the pizza shop property are quick to claim that others have broken
law  (ex. Town Clerk) but may have violated town laws at the same time.

I didn't know Mike owned the Pizza shop.  Hmmm  I guess we have are info wrong.  Why is the GOP spreading rumors that Mike owned the Pizza shop?  Maybe trying to deflect from the nefarious activities in the pizza shop?  I don't know I smell sumptin and it aint crispy calzones.  Tax evasion maybe but not crispy calzones!  HeHeHe

Mike doesn't own the pizza shop - he owns the building.

Maybe you should stop listening to RUMORS and ask the source.

I know Mike owns the bldg.  I know he owns First Class Products and I know who owns the pizza joint.  The GOP are the one's spreading rumors to protect their patron saint of mysoginy.

So the GOP is telling everyone that WHO owns the building?

The GOP is trying to imply that Mike has some connection to the pizza business and nefariuos activity.  He doesn't have nor does he want any association with the Parisi Pizza gang other than a hostile landlord/tenent situation. K?

Quoted from DemocraticVoiceOfReason

I do know that there are questions about the number of businesses (3) and the apartment in a building only approved for 2 businesses.

I have heard that there may have been another "business" operating that wasn't advertised on the sign on the outside of the building - that is all that I
can say publicly for now,

The implication here, and the way it is written, is that there is a zoning issue, which placed the responsibility squarely on the property owner. If that is the implication here, it has nothing to do with 4 corners pizza. They were just a tenant.

Quoted from Peeper

The GOP is trying to imply that Mike has some connection to the pizza business and nefariuos activity.  He doesn't have nor does he want any association with the Parisi Pizza gang other than a hostile landlord/tenent situation. K?

Exactly WHO in the GOP is implying such things???