Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Residence Win Becker St. Rezoning Lawsuit
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Residence Win Becker St. Rezoning Lawsuit Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 24 Guests

Residence Win Becker St. Rezoning Lawsuit  This thread currently has 2,843 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Admin
July 20, 2012, 4:45am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Quoted Text
Rotterdam zone change lawsuit appeal upheld
I-88 area residents reverse town action

Friday, July 20, 2012
By Justin Mason (Contact)
Gazette Reporter

ROTTERDAM — Rotterdam improperly rezoned 3.4 acres near the Interstate 88 interchange for commercial uses without taking into consideration the effect the change would have on the nearby residential area along Becker Drive, an appeals court ruled Thursday.
The state Supreme Court’s Appellate Division ruled that members of the Town Board failed their due diligence under the state’s Environmental Quality Review Act in approving developer Robert Iovinella’s zone change request. In overturning a lower court ruling, the justices found the board failed to show how residential concerns over the loss of a wooded buffer between the homes and Duanesburg Road were “addressed in any meaningful way” before the measure was approved in February 2010.
“Because the Town Board failed to take the requisite hard look at the environmental impacts of development of the subject property for commercial use, both the negative declaration [under SEQR] and the resolution that rezoned the property must be annulled,” Justice Leslie Stein wrote in the four-page ruling.
The annulment doesn’t preclude Iovinella from reapplying for the zone change and going through the process again. Andrew Brick, an attorney for the developer, said “We’re going to continue to analyze it and review all options available.”
Becker Drive resident Lori Bergami, one of four neighbors who filed the initial lawsuit, was thrilled by Thursday’s ruling. She hopes the ruling convinces town officials to pay closer attention to the concerns of residents before making a zone change.
“All that I ever wanted to do is preserve the character of my neighborhood,” she said. “I’m just hoping that they take into consideration the laws they’re supposed to be abiding.”
Jeffrey Baker, the attorney representing the four residents, said the ruling means Iovinella will now have to go through the full review process if he hopes to change the zone. He faulted the board for granting the zone change without having the developer outline his exact plans for the property.
“What they tried to do is punt it into the future,” he said.
Town Attorney Kate McGuirl did not return requests for comment.
Iovinella initially asked for the zone change in 2005, but later withdrew his application when the town’s Planning Commission didn’t act on it. He submitted the same request four years later and received a positive recommendation from the commission.
Then in September 2009, several property owners filed a protest petition with the town objecting to the rezoning on the grounds that it was inconsistent with the surrounding properties. The all-Republican town board never took action on the application before the November election, in which four out of five members were voted out of office; the fifth resigned in December.
In February, the new board revived Iovinella’s application and conducted a public hearing, despite not knowing the type of commercial project the developer intended to build. Numerous adjoining residents again objected, claiming commercial development would destroy the character of their neighborhood and remove a critical buffer between their homes and the Interstate 88 interchange off Duanesburg Road.
The board ultimately sided with the developer, approving the zone change and amendment to the comprehensive plan. The approval prompted the residents to file an Article 78 lawsuit against Rotterdam and Iovinella in July 2010, claiming the zone change didn’t comply with Rotterdam’s comprehensive plan and was done without the town meeting State Environmental Quality Review requirements.
The lawsuit was dismissed in April 2011 after a Supreme Court justice in Schenectady County ruled the town met its obligations in reviewing Iovinella’s zone change request. The ruling also indicated the town had gone through great lengths to properly balance commercial needs with the character of the surrounding neighborhood near Thruway Exit 25A..........................>>>>..................>>>>................http://www.dailygazette.com/news/2012/jul/20/0720_lawsuit/
Logged
Private Message
alias
July 20, 2012, 6:56am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Town Attorney Kate McGuirl did not return requests for comment.


She never does..........................
Logged
E-mail Reply: 1 - 16
alias
July 20, 2012, 6:58am Report to Moderator
Guest User
And the planning board trolls response is..........................here I'll do it and save him the typing ........"I wasn't a member of the planning board when this transpired."
Logged
E-mail Reply: 2 - 16
bumblethru
July 20, 2012, 7:24am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Oh this goes WELL beyond the planning board!! It was that laughable REVITALIZE ROTTERDAM town board that squeaked this one through. I'm sure it is recorded somewhere on this forum!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 16
AVON
July 20, 2012, 7:30am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
785
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
109 days 14 hours 28 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
Oh this goes WELL beyond the planning board!! It was that laughable REVITALIZE ROTTERDAM town board that squeaked this one through. I'm sure it is recorded somewhere on this forum!!!


It was one of FDGs favors for each millionaire club member, Becker's Dr. Bobby I.; the triangle & Timmy L.; Floral Ave. and Tommy D.!
Logged
Private Message Reply: 4 - 16
Shadow
July 20, 2012, 7:33am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
11,107
Reputation
70.83%
Reputation Score
+17 / -7
Time Online
448 days 17 minutes
This has been going on long before FDG it's become a way of life in Rotterdam.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 16
SueM2342
July 20, 2012, 11:30am Report to Moderator
Full Member
Posts
281
Reputation
16.67%
Reputation Score
+1 / -5
Time Online
8 days 12 hours 30 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
This has been going on long before FDG it's become a way of life in Rotterdam.


And it should stop
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 16
bumblethru
July 20, 2012, 11:34am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Quoted from SueM2342


And it should stop


NEVER!!!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 16
CICERO
July 20, 2012, 12:07pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
18,232
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
702 days 15 hours 7 minutes
Quoted Text
In overturning a lower court ruling, the justices found the board failed to show how residential concerns over the loss of a wooded buffer between the homes and Duanesburg Road were “addressed in any meaningful way” before the measure was approved in February 2010.


It "Wasn't addressed in a meaningful way"?  You mean Bobby I turning around and chastising the attendees of the town board meeting for daring to stand up to the bully developer isn't addressing it in a meaningful way?  Hmmm...This court doesn't understand how business is done in Rotterdam.


Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 16
bumblethru
July 20, 2012, 2:45pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
30,841
Reputation
78.26%
Reputation Score
+36 / -10
Time Online
412 days 18 hours 59 minutes
Wasn't it BI who was delinquent on his property taxes too because he thought they were too high? And wasn't it DM who pleaded to the then town board in behalf of BI???

Ya just can't make this stuff up in rottENdam!!


When the INSANE are running the ASYLUM
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule. -- Friedrich Nietzsche


“How fortunate for those in power that people never think.”
Adolph Hitler
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 16
exit3
July 20, 2012, 4:12pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
661
Reputation
20.00%
Reputation Score
+1 / -4
Time Online
7 days 10 hours 56 minutes
the locals should learn from BI example
change their zoning to something that would make his property worthless

if the planning commission and zoning boards didnt Fu<k BI over in the early 70's over having horses on his property - he would have made his $$ off of 50 or so building lots

pay back is a b!tch
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 16
senders
July 22, 2012, 7:09am Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
sleaze bags


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 11 - 16
Admin
July 22, 2012, 11:33am Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
18,484
Reputation
64.00%
Reputation Score
+16 / -9
Time Online
769 days 23 minutes
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 16
alias
July 22, 2012, 11:36am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Logged
E-mail Reply: 13 - 16
senders
July 22, 2012, 1:17pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
29,348
Reputation
70.97%
Reputation Score
+22 / -9
Time Online
1574 days 2 hours 22 minutes
no wealth here....

just some big fish in a small bowl


...you are a product of your environment, your environment is a product of your priorities, your priorities are a product of you......

The replacement of morality and conscience with law produces a deadly paradox.


STOP BEING GOOD DEMOCRATS---STOP BEING GOOD REPUBLICANS--START BEING GOOD AMERICANS

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 14 - 16
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    Inside Rotterdam  ›  Residence Win Becker St. Rezoning Lawsuit

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread