|
|
 JoAnn |
| November 23, 2010, 1:02pm |
|
 Administrator Group  Posts
2,005
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 8 hours 22 minutes
|
I didn't call anyone a liar. I know for a fact that the Diocese of Albany's policy about annullments was
NOTHING like what she described after about 1980.
I'm not disputing the Diocese of Albany's policy. But my friend's annulment happened exactly as I said. |
|
 Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
| DemocraticVoiceOfReason |
| November 23, 2010, 2:38pm |
|
 Hero Member Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
|
I'm not disputing the Diocese of Albany's policy. But my friend's annulment happened exactly as I said.
Then it had to have happened BEFORE 1980 -- that is all I am saying. |
| “And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| Shadow |
| November 23, 2010, 2:44pm |
|
Hero Member Posts
8,561
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
319 days 12 hours 7 minutes
|
I also know of a couple who went to see a priest for counseling due to marital infidelity on the husbands part. When the counseling was over the priest told the woman to get a divorce that there was no hope of saving her marriage based on what the husband told the priest. You won't read that in any church doctrine either. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| Kevin March |
| November 23, 2010, 3:08pm |
|
 Hero Member Posts
3,070
Reputation
83.33%
Reputation Score
+10 / -2
Time Online
88 days 14 hours 3 minutes
|
I also know of a couple who went to see a priest for counseling due to marital infidelity on the husbands part. When the counseling was over the priest told the woman to get a divorce that there was no hope of saving her marriage based on what the husband told the priest. You won't read that in any church doctrine either.
Actually, that's not true. Infidelity is one of the true grounds for divorce as per the bible. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| JoAnn |
| November 23, 2010, 3:13pm |
|
Administrator Group Posts
2,005
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 8 hours 22 minutes
|
Then it had to have happened BEFORE 1980 -- that is all I am saying.
It was after 1983. |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
| DemocraticVoiceOfReason |
| November 23, 2010, 3:54pm |
|
Hero Member Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
|
I also know of a couple who went to see a priest for counseling due to marital infidelity on the husbands part. When the counseling was over the priest told the woman to get a divorce that there was no hope of saving her marriage based on what the husband told the priest. You won't read that in any church doctrine either.
You won't find anything in church doctrine that requires either husband or wife to remain civilly married to a spouse who is unfaithful. |
| “And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan |
|
| Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
