Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Sandra Lee for NY First Lady
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Sandra Lee for NY First Lady Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 2 Guests

Sandra Lee for NY First Lady  This thread currently has 668 views. |
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 13, 2010, 5:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
I hope that Andrew Cuomo does the respectable thing and marries Sandra Lee.  She would
be a cool first lady ... we have enjoyed her Food Network for years.


“And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message
benny salami
November 13, 2010, 7:09pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
7,531
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
126 days 44 minutes
She doesn't want to remarry. Having her around the campaign probably tricked another few sheeple into voting for him.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 1 - 35
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 16, 2010, 3:54pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
Andrew Cuomo won the election for Governor because he was a better candidate for the office than
Carl Paladino.   I hardly think that Sandra Lee made a difference in the outcome.


“And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message Reply: 2 - 35
benny salami
November 16, 2010, 4:14pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
7,531
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
126 days 44 minutes
She didn't hurt. She added missing star quality. When you look at her-he almost seems to make sense.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 3 - 35
boomer
November 16, 2010, 10:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,504
Reputation
57.14%
Reputation Score
+4 / -3
Time Online
20 days 22 hours 11 minutes
Well you might want to consider this---for whatever reason, Cuomo may not want to remarry because that cuts him out of the faith.  (I think he should get married if he wants and forget the other but that might be a consideration)
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 35
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 22, 2010, 2:08pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
Quoted from boomer
Well you might want to consider this---for whatever reason, Cuomo may not want to remarry because that cuts him out of the faith.  (I think he should get married if he wants and forget the other but that might be a consideration)


If Mr. Cuomo has/had his first marriage annulled by the Catholic Church ... he would not be  
"cut out of the faith".


“And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message Reply: 5 - 35
GrahamBonnet
November 22, 2010, 3:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,144
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+15 / -5
Time Online
105 days 20 hours 11 minutes
...why would he have it annulled? Just b/c a spouse cheats on you doesn't mean you didn't have a valid marriage and your kids are illegitimate.


Malleus Democrapum
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 35
bumblethru
November 22, 2010, 3:44pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
20,603
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+26 / -8
Time Online
100 days 23 hours 13 minutes
that is just a money grab by the catholic church.


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
-James Madison

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 7 - 35
benny salami
November 22, 2010, 4:05pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
7,531
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
126 days 44 minutes
Quoted from boomer
Well you might want to consider this---for whatever reason, Cuomo may not want to remarry because that cuts him out of the faith.  (I think he should get married if he wants and forget the other but that might be a consideration)


She doesn't want to remarry. He would marry her in a NY minute. Once she takes a look around Smallbany don't expect her to be back.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 35
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 22, 2010, 4:56pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
Quoted from GrahamBonnet
...why would he have it annulled? Just b/c a spouse cheats on you doesn't mean you didn't have a valid marriage and your kids are illegitimate.


For the record -- having a marriage annulled by the Catholic church does NOT make the children of the
marriage illegitimate.

For the record -- if a Catholic divorces and has the marriage annulled .. the Catholic is free to marry another
person without losing their standing in the Catholic Church.

You folks like to bash the Catholic Church .. but you don't have a clue about the Canon Law of Marriage or
most other issues.


“And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 35
Shadow
November 22, 2010, 5:01pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,561
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
319 days 12 hours 7 minutes
It's a very expensive process to get an annulment in the Catholic church.and your ex has to agree to your version of what happened. At least that's the way it was explained to me when I checked into a possible annulment.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 10 - 35
DemocraticVoiceOfReason
November 22, 2010, 5:19pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
8,570
Reputation
23.08%
Reputation Score
+9 / -30
Time Online
127 days 6 hours 56 minutes
Quoted from Shadow
It's a very expensive process to get an annulment in the Catholic church.and your ex has to agree to your version of what happened. At least that's the way it was explained to me when I checked into a possible annulment.


Both not true - The Diocese of Albany does not charge anything for the annullment process - and only asks  for a voluntary donation AFTER the process is over.
  
While it is helpful to have the cooperation of the  ex-spouse, it is NOT required.  A reasonable attempt is
made to contact the ex-spouse and have them answer some questions on a form.    

There is NO requirement that the ex-spouse must agree to your version.



“And yet our opponents tell us not to interfere with abortion. They tell us not to impose our morality on those who wish to allow or participate in the taking of the life of infants before birth. Yet no one calls it imposing morality to prohibit the taking of life after a child is born. We’re told about a woman’s right to control her own body. But doesn’t the unborn child have a higher right, and that is to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?” – Ronald Reagan
Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 35
Shadow
November 22, 2010, 6:59pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,561
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
319 days 12 hours 7 minutes
The church on the corner of Albany and Kings Rd was where the procedure for applying for an annulment was told to a group of us seeking information about getting and annulment. There was a $1000 donation figure thrown out for the paper work, investigation, and procesing. I was told my ex would have to sign the paper work that I submitted agreeing with said paper work being submittede and I kneew right then and there that wasn't going to happen. I could care less what Albany does and it was indicated to us that without the $1000 donation ,as you call it, nothing was going to happen.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 12 - 35
Box A Rox
November 22, 2010, 7:15pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
6,824
Reputation
65.00%
Reputation Score
+13 / -7
Time Online
173 days 14 hours 33 minutes
From the Albany Diocese PDF on annulment:

13. Is there a fee?
The Marriage Tribunal is subsidized by the faithful of the Diocese, most of whom never require
its services. To help defray the subsidy, the person who submits a petition is asked for $350.00. A
filing fee of $100.00 is requested. After the final decision has been rendered, a person may pay
the balance. of $250.00 any way he/she is able. If anyone requires a reduction or a total waiver of
the fee, the Tribunal will arrange to honor such a request.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL A PERSON'S PETITION BE REJECTED BECAUSE
THAT PERSON IS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO MEET THE EXPENSE INCURRED BY THE
TRIBUNAL IN A GIVEN CASE.
Albany Diocese:
http://www.rcda.org/Offices/canonical_services/PDF/tribunal%20flyer.pdf


  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 13 - 35
Shadow
November 22, 2010, 7:28pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,561
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
319 days 12 hours 7 minutes
It would appear that the church has changed some of the rules since I inquired about an annulment. Now it's only $600 donation and you can say what you want I was told in confidence that if you don't send in the donation you wouldn't get the annulment.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 35
3 Pages 1 2 3 » Recommend Thread
|


Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread