Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Patterson Plan to Hike Taxes on Rich
Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Patterson Plan to Hike Taxes on Rich Moderators: Admin
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 3 Guests

Patterson Plan to Hike Taxes on Rich  This thread currently has 429 views. |
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
Brad Littlefield
March 23, 2009, 5:23pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text

GOV PLOTS SECRET TAX HIKE ON RICH

Exclusive by Fredric U. Dicker

Last updated: 9:38 am
March 23, 2009
Posted: 1:41 am
March 23, 2009

GOV. PATERSON and legislative Democrats have secretly agreed on an $8 billion, two- year tax hike on individuals making more than $500,000 a year that will "sunset" around the time he plans to run for election in 2010, legislative sources told The Post.

Also under intense discussion yesterday as lawmakers rushed to complete a budget by April 1 is a proposal to raise the state's 4 percent sales tax to 4.5 percent the total of which would jump to close to 10 percent in parts of the state with the addition of local sales taxes.

...



http://www.nypost.com/seven/03232009/news/columnists/gov_plots_secret_tax_hike_on_rich_160855.htm

Logged
E-mail
MobileTerminal
March 23, 2009, 6:11pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
10,320
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
401 days 4 hours 40 minutes
Quoted Text
4 in 5 think Paterson is doing a bad job

By IRENE JAY LIU, Capitol bureau
Last updated: 1:40 p.m., Monday, March 23, 2009

ALBANY -- Gov. David Paterson's favorability and job approval ratings continue to plummet, according to the latest poll from the Siena Research Institute.

     
In short:

Paterson is viewed favorably by 29 percent of voters and unfavorably by 58 percent, down from last month's 40-47 percent rating.

His job performance rating is 19 percent positive, 78 percent negative, down from 28-69 percent last month. His performance rating has plummeted since Jan. 26 - three days after he announced his selection of then U.S. Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand to replace Hillary Clinton in the Senate.

Days of critical news coverage followed that questioned Paterson's handling of how he made the choice.


http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=782770


Is it any wonder why?


“There's a term for Obama - not two terms.” – Kimmel.

Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 1 - 18
pg13
March 23, 2009, 6:20pm Report to Moderator

Sr. Member
Posts
432
Reputation
100.00%
Reputation Score
+2 / -0
Time Online
18 days 2 hours 40 minutes
This is a horrible idea, one that I am not surprised to see Patterson attempt. (This particular proposal certainly
doesn't personally affect me) Why can't politicians understand one simple idea; less government ='s less taxes.
Don't raise taxes on any segment of our society or institute new taxes----- LESS GOVERNMENT!
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 2 - 18
Salvatore
March 23, 2009, 6:45pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
1,830
Reputation
28.57%
Reputation Score
+4 / -10
Time Online
21 days 5 hours 52 minutes
I say that you have to cut the wasting and raise the taxes so you can the good services for kids and seniors and we dont do enough to help the people and working familys at all over there
Logged
Private Message Reply: 3 - 18
bumblethru
March 23, 2009, 11:30pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
20,597
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+26 / -8
Time Online
100 days 22 hours 35 minutes
Hey....go ahead and tax the rich. Ya know, the ones that employ us? They will just flee the state, there will be less jobs, less money going into the tax base...hence our taxes will increase.

Great idea! NOT!


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
-James Madison

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 4 - 18
bumblethru
April 10, 2009, 10:37am Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
20,597
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+26 / -8
Time Online
100 days 22 hours 35 minutes
Trump Furious Over New York Taxes

Monday, April 6, 2009 2:19 PM

     Article Font Size  

New York’s most famous billionaire, Donald Trump, is furious over his state’s proposed “millionaires’ tax.”

He hasn’t yet said he would leave the state, but he did place an angry phone call to New York Gov. David Paterson to complain about the plan to impose new taxes on residents earning more than $500,000 a year.

“It’s very dangerous, what’s going on in Albany,” Trump — host of the hit TV show “Celebrity Apprentice” — told New York Post columnist Linda Stasi after his call to Paterson.

“Rich people are going to leave this state. Why should they pay New York State taxes on money they made out of state?”

He added: “I told the governor, everyone is going to move to Palm Beach [Fla.], the nicest place in the world, where there is no income tax!”

Asked by Stasi if he would be leaving New York, Trump replied: “No comment. And you know what that means.”

Trump, of course, lives part-time at his world famous Mar-a-Lago mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, so finding new permanent digs in a state with no income tax would be easy.

Trump’s tirade against New York’s vampire-like tax squeeze came on the heels of last week’s announcement by conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh.

Limbaugh, who resides in Florida, but occasionally broadcasts from New York and pays taxes when he doesn’t, vowed to sell all his Manhattan property and shut down his operations in New York. He is threatening to move them to Texas, another state with no income tax.

“I'll sell my apartment. I'll sell my condominium. I'm going to get out of there totally,” Rush said.

Limbaugh usually broadcasts from Palm Beach County but said he may need another location to broadcast from in case of hurricanes.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidec.....mp;promo_code=7D77-1


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
-James Madison

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 5 - 18
JoAnn
April 18, 2009, 9:33pm Report to Moderator

Administrator Group
Posts
2,005
Reputation
60.00%
Reputation Score
+3 / -2
Time Online
19 days 8 hours 22 minutes
Businesses got their notification this week that starting May 1st, the payroll deductions for people making $200,000 and over will increase.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 6 - 18
MobileTerminal
April 18, 2009, 11:09pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
10,320
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
401 days 4 hours 40 minutes
Quoted from JoAnn
Businesses got their notification this week that starting May 1st, the payroll deductions for people making $200,000 and over will increase.


Anyone here making that kind of scratch? If so, you need an adoptee ... I'm available to be used as a "deduction"


“There's a term for Obama - not two terms.” – Kimmel.

Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 7 - 18
bumblethru
April 19, 2009, 3:27pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
20,597
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+26 / -8
Time Online
100 days 22 hours 35 minutes
Not me, but I'm sure that most business owners do. So what the heck, penalize them for taking a risk, employing people and giving them benefits. What the heck is our government even thinking?


If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
-James Madison

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 8 - 18
MobileTerminal
April 19, 2009, 3:46pm Report to Moderator

Out of NY and LOVING it!
Hero Member
Posts
10,320
Reputation
68.97%
Reputation Score
+20 / -9
Time Online
401 days 4 hours 40 minutes
Quoted from bumblethru
What the heck is our government even thinking?


...or are they



“There's a term for Obama - not two terms.” – Kimmel.

Vivat Jesus
Knights of Columbus, Fourth Degree
In Him, all things are possible
Logged
Private Message Reply: 9 - 18
benny salami
April 19, 2009, 3:59pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
7,529
Reputation
68.00%
Reputation Score
+17 / -8
Time Online
125 days 23 hours 58 minutes
Did you hear the latest from our illegitimate Gov Patterson? He stated that there are 3 branches of government; State Senate, Assembly and Executive! He forgot judiciary-and he's an attorney!

  How much longer are Gov Dean, Sal and Andrew Cuomo going to support this guy? Patterson couldn't win dog catcher in 2010. Even in Schenectady County-or Bronx North.
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 10 - 18
Admin
May 19, 2009, 11:15pm Report to Moderator
Board Moderator
Posts
17,049
Reputation
65.00%
Reputation Score
+13 / -7
Time Online
186 days 3 hours 7 minutes
Logged
Private Message Reply: 11 - 18
mikechristine1
June 21, 2009, 12:57pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
3,351
Reputation
76.47%
Reputation Score
+13 / -4
Time Online
45 days 15 hours 29 minutes
Should the government tax the rich to provide needed services or should we average people pay increased property taxes, lose our homes, go without medication, etc?

Suppose a rich person is going to buy a modest car and is looking at the same car that I'm interested in, a $20,000 car.  Once sales tax is added on, that may cause me to decide not to buy that car because I won't have the money.  The rich person doesn't have any concern about paying those sale taxes.

Rich people pay a substantially smaller percentage of their income in taxes overall than the average person.   And look at social security.  A person earning $50,000 a year pays that, what six point something percent of their income into FICA tax.  What percent of their annual income does a rich person with a $500,000 salary pay in FICA tax??????    And then, like a neighbor of mine who died a few years ago, worked 38 year, paid a fortune over his lifetime into Social security and then when he died, what was the return on all that money?  A measly $255 to his wife (their kids are grown).  
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 12 - 18
Shadow
June 21, 2009, 1:07pm Report to Moderator
Hero Member
Posts
8,550
Reputation
72.73%
Reputation Score
+16 / -6
Time Online
319 days 5 hours 41 minutes
The down side to taxing the rich is that they have the money to move out of the state and take their money with them and the end result is we get none of their money in taxes as Tom Golisano and Rush did.
Logged
Private Message Reply: 13 - 18
GrahamBonnet
June 21, 2009, 1:42pm Report to Moderator

Hero Member
Posts
7,130
Reputation
75.00%
Reputation Score
+15 / -5
Time Online
105 days 18 hours 13 minutes
We can never tax our way to prosperity. No matter who pays the taxes.


Malleus Democrapum
Logged
Private Message Reply: 14 - 18
2 Pages 1 2 » Recommend Thread
|

Rotterdam NY...the people's voice    Rotterdam's Virtual Internet Community    New York State  ›  Patterson Plan to Hike Taxes on Rich

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread